A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment
Two rationality arguments are used to justify the link between conditional and unconditional preferences in decision theory: dynamic consistency and consequentialism. Dynamic consistency requires that ex ante contingent choices are respected by updated preferences. Consequentialism states that only...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | Book/Monograph Arbeitspapier |
| Sprache: | Deutsch Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Heidelberg
Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Heidelberg
September 2009
Heidelberg University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics September 2009 |
| Schriftenreihe: | Discussion paper series / Universität Heidelberg, Department of Economics
no. 487 |
| In: |
Discussion paper series (no. 487)
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Resolving-System, kostenfrei, Volltext: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-opus-98286 Verlag, Volltext: http://www.awi.uni-heidelberg.de/with2/Discussion%20papers/papers/dp487.pdf Resolving-System, Volltext: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/127306 
|
| Verfasserangaben: | Adam Dominiak, Peter Dürsch, and Jean-Philippe Lefort |
Search Result 1
Search Result 2
Search Result 3