Buchumschlag

The general movement optimality score-revised (GMOS-R) with socioeconomically stratified percentile ranks

Background: The general movement optimality score (GMOS) quantifies the details of general movements (GMs). We recently conducted psychometric analyses of the GMOS and developed a revised scoresheet. Consequently, the GMOS-Revised (GMOS-R) instrument necessitated validation using new percentile rank...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Einspieler, Christa (VerfasserIn) , Bos, Arend F. (VerfasserIn) , Spittle, Alicia J. (VerfasserIn) , Bertoncelli, Natascia (VerfasserIn) , Burger, Marlette (VerfasserIn) , Peyton, Colleen (VerfasserIn) , Toldo, Moreno (VerfasserIn) , Utsch, Fabiana (VerfasserIn) , Marschik, Dajie (VerfasserIn) , Marschik, Peter B. (VerfasserIn)
Dokumenttyp: Article (Journal)
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 13 April 2024
In: Journal of Clinical Medicine
Year: 2024, Jahrgang: 13, Heft: 8, Pages: 1-16
ISSN:2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13082260
Online-Zugang:Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082260
Verlag, kostenfrei, Volltext: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/8/2260
Volltext
Verfasserangaben:Christa Einspieler, Arend F. Bos, Alicia J. Spittle, Natascia Bertoncelli, Marlette Burger, Colleen Peyton, Moreno Toldo, Fabiana Utsch, Dajie Zhang, Peter B. Marschik
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The general movement optimality score (GMOS) quantifies the details of general movements (GMs). We recently conducted psychometric analyses of the GMOS and developed a revised scoresheet. Consequently, the GMOS-Revised (GMOS-R) instrument necessitated validation using new percentile ranks. This study aimed to provide these percentile ranks for the GMOS-R and to investigate whether sex, preterm birth, or the infant’s country of birth and residence affected the GMOS-R distribution. Methods: We applied the GMOS-R to an international sample of 1983 infants (32% female, 44% male, and 24% not disclosed), assessed in the extremely and very preterm period (10%), moderate (12%) and late (22%) preterm periods, at term (25%), and post-term age (31%). Data were grouped according to the World Bank’s classification into lower- and upper-middle-income countries (LMICs and UMICs; 26%) or high-income countries (HICs; 74%), respectively. Results: We found that sex and preterm or term birth did not affect either GM classification or the GMOS-R, but the country of residence did. A lower median GMOS-R for infants with normal or poor-repertoire GMs from LMICs and UMICs compared with HICs suggests the use of specific percentile ranks for LMICs and UMICs vs. HICs. Conclusion: For clinical and scientific use, we provide a freely available GMOS-R scoring sheet, with percentile ranks reflecting socioeconomic stratification.
Beschreibung:Gesehen am 28.01.2025
Beschreibung:Online Resource
ISSN:2077-0383
DOI:10.3390/jcm13082260

Ähnliche Einträge